Talk:Washington State Route 104

Washington State Route 104 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
January 30, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed
April 23, 2013	WikiProject A-class review	Not approved

Current status: Good article

U.S. Roads: State highways / Washington Mid‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Washington
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

United States: Washington Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Washington.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 104/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 09:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Eh. Why not? –TC N7 JM 09:35, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lead

Nothing wrong to note.

Route description

"SR 104 begins at a partial cloverleaf interchange with an at-grade traffic signal in the center with US 101" This doesn't really read well, but I can't think of a better way to put it. Maybe...gah...I don't know. You try something. :\

I removed traffic signal and moved at-grade in front of partial. It seems better. Sounder Bruce 22:56, 30 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Looks better. –TC N7 JM 01:59, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

"The highway between Discovery Bay and Kingston and between SR 99 and I-5 in Edmonds and Shoreline are designated as part of the National Highway System," Incorrect subject-verb agreement. Maybe say something like, "The segments of the highway between...are"
- Fixed.

History

"to US 99 and PSH 1 Woodway" Did you mean in Woodway?
- Fixed.

Spur route/Major intersection

You say in the Spur route section that SR 104 Spur begins at the county line, but this isn't displayed in the RJL. This is inconsistent.
- ~~Should I list both cities/both counties? Or use {{jctbridge}}?~~
  - Nevermind. Resolved in IRC. Sounder Bruce 02:13, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

References

Refs 44 and 55 could probably be shortened a bit using hidden text.
- Fixed.

Final verdict

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Just these couple fixes
Pass/Fail:

Alrighty then. Passing now! –TC N7 JM 02:19, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]